CI passing isn’t the same as tested
Teams that move fast often notice the same thing: it’s easy to ship features, but much harder to be really confident it actually works as expected – beyond what automated checks catch. Also, not all PRs are the same: Is there an easy way to acceptance test critical features in an ever-growing number of pull requests each day?
Maybe you don’t have dedicated testers yet in your team, and you’re trying to figure out how one would even fit into a GitHub-centric team. Maybe you have testers assigned, but their work lives in spreadsheets, Notion pages, or a separate tool that nobody on the dev side ever opens.
Either way, the gap is the same: there’s no clear picture of what has been tested by your testers, what hasn’t, and what the current quality situation actually looks like, and how to reuse and share testing-related assets when things grow.

